🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim endured defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to the team's most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for losing individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Over Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, such directives hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, with no penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – simply operate at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

An Supreme Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his preference for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style to football “will be decided by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his previous experience in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their methods to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or fails of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for playing too much 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and then bin them for requiring excessive time. And above all be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.